State Data Report

Vending machine locations in Connecticut, by the numbers

One listing, fully reported, sitting in the top tier of its venue type — and a region around it that six states share seven placements between them.

On this page 5 sections
A single card pinned high on a sparse corkboard, a calculator and ruled chart below
One Connecticut listing, in the top tier of its type, inside a thin New England record. AI-generated image

Connecticut contributes one listing to the record, and it is a well-reported one at the top of its venue type: a Winsted bowling alley at about 210 visitors a day, roughly 50% above the national bowling median, which agreed exactly the median share. The region around it is thinner than any comparable part of the country.

Figures below come from the 87 signed listings open on PinPoint Vending’s marketplace on October 5, 2026. Traffic is venue-reported and unaudited; no listing reports sales.

By the numbers

MeasureConnecticut
Signed placements1
Reporting a visitor count1 of 1
Reported visitors75,000 a year, 210 a day
Visitor-hours a dayabout 567
Venue share40% of net
New England placements, six states7

What is on the record for Connecticut?

A single listing with no gaps in it, which puts the state ahead of several with more placements.

FieldValue
CityWinsted
Venue typeBowling alley
TierStandard
SignedAugust 25, 2026
Reported visitors75,000 a year, 210 a day
Revenue share40% of net
Minimum term16 months
MachineCotton candy

Completeness is worth noting because it is uneven across the dataset: 69 of 87 listings report traffic, and California manages only three of seven. Connecticut reports one of one.

How does Winsted compare with its venue type?

Favourably, and by a wide margin. Bowling alleys are the most common category in the record with 18 placements, 16 of which report traffic, and their median is 137 visitors a day.

Bowling alleysMedian nationallyWinsted
Counted listings161
Visitors a day137210
Visit length used2.7 h2.7 h
Visitor-hours a day370about 567
Venue share40% of net40% of net

At about 567 visitor-hours a day, Winsted clears not only the bowling median but the median family entertainment centre at 445, which is the highest-ranked venue type overall. The measure comes from Bureau of Labor Statistics time-use data on how long people bowl, applied as our ranking of vending locations sets out.

Did that traffic buy a better share?

No, and the finding is more interesting than it first appears. Winsted reports roughly 50% more traffic than the typical bowling alley and agreed exactly the same 40% of net.

Across the record the share barely responds to traffic at all. What it responds to is venue category: all eleven pass-through venues — shops, malls, electronics stores, delis, forecourts — were paid 50%, and destination venues almost all 40% or 30%, regardless of how many people walk through. A high-traffic bowling alley and a quiet one sit at the same number.

That is the single most consistent relationship in this dataset, and it holds in Connecticut’s one listing as cleanly as in states with seven. What the revenue-share data shows across all 87 placements tests it directly against traffic.

How thin is New England in this record?

Thin enough to be its own finding. Six states share seven placements between them, which is what Ohio holds alone.

New England stateSigned placements
Maine2
Massachusetts2
New Hampshire2
Connecticut1
Rhode Island0
Vermont0

Set against a region with roughly 15 million people and a dense recreation market, seven placements reads as light coverage rather than low demand. The record is one locator’s signed venues over a single 2026 season, so a thin region most plausibly reflects where a route network reaches — the same caution that applies to the blank interior west, where seven contiguous states show nothing at all.

Connecticut’s own geography cuts the other way, though, and it is worth noting for anyone reading this as a market signal: the state is compact enough that a single operator could service several venues in a day, which is not true in most of the states with deeper records. Vending machine locations by state sets out the whole distribution.

What can one listing not tell you?

The usual three things, and they matter more when the sample is one. There is no distribution, so no Connecticut range and no basis for predicting a second venue’s terms. There are no outcomes, because no listing anywhere in the record reports sales — a share and a traffic count are inputs. And there is no persistence: the record captures a signature in August 2026 and would look identical if the machine were removed in October.

What the listing does support is narrow and genuinely useful. A busy bowling alley in Connecticut signed at 40% of net on a 16-month minimum in August 2026, and that is a real local comparison to put in front of a venue or a locator — which 21 states cannot offer at all.

Frequently asked questions

How many vending machine placements does Connecticut have?

One, in the record collected on October 5, 2026: a bowling alley in Winsted signed on August 25, 2026. It reports a visitor count and a revenue share, so Connecticut’s record is complete as far as it goes.

How busy is Connecticut’s vending venue?

It reports 75,000 visitors a year, about 210 a day, against a national median of 137 for bowling alleys. At the 2.7-hour visit length used for bowling that is roughly 567 visitor-hours a day, in the top tier of its type.

What share did the Connecticut venue take?

Forty per cent of net sales, the national median, despite reporting roughly 50% more traffic than the typical bowling alley. Traffic did not translate into a higher share.

How does New England look in the record?

Thin. Connecticut has one placement, Massachusetts two, Maine two, New Hampshire two, and Rhode Island and Vermont none — seven across six states, against seven in Ohio alone.

Does a single listing support any conclusions?

Narrow ones. It shows that a bowling alley of that size in that state signed on those terms on that date. It cannot describe Connecticut demand, typical traffic, or whether the machine is still in place.

Next step

Use Winsted as a traffic benchmark rather than a share benchmark. If a Connecticut venue quotes you footfall, the useful comparison is 210 a day and about 567 visitor-hours, which is a high bar; if it quotes you a share, the comparison is simply 40%, because that is what the busiest documented bowling alley in the state agreed and nothing in the record suggests traffic moves it.

Sources

Data Listing figures come from The Dwell Time vending location dataset: the 87 marketplace listings open on (CSV, CC BY 4.0).

Review Last reviewed . Next review by .