On this page 5 sections

Alaska returns a genuine zero. It has no signed placement in the open marketplace record, and unlike the other 20 empty states it is one of just two the specialty locator has named as outside its coverage. That makes Alaska’s blank row the most explainable one in the dataset — and still not evidence about the Alaskan market.
The figures here come from the 87 signed listings open on PinPoint Vending’s marketplace on October 5, 2026, plus that company’s own published coverage statement. Traffic in the record is venue-reported and unaudited, and no listing reports sales.
By the numbers
| Measure | Alaska |
|---|---|
| Signed placements | 0 |
| States with none | 21 of 50 |
| States outside the specialty locator’s coverage | 2 (Alaska, Hawaii) |
| Venue types represented | 0 of 26 |
| National median share, for reference | 40% of net |
| National minimum term, for reference | 16 months |
What does a zero in this dataset actually mean?
A zero means no signed placement was listed, and that is all it means. The record is one locator’s signed venues over a single 2026 season, so an empty state is a state that locator did not sign in — which may be because it does not work there, did not get there, or found nothing to sign.
Alaska is the rare case where the first explanation is on the record. The locator states its coverage as every state except Alaska and Hawaii, so the absence of Alaskan placements follows directly from a published business decision rather than from anything observed about Alaska. Twenty of the other empty states have no such statement attached, which makes their zeros genuinely ambiguous and Alaska’s merely uninformative.
The distinction matters when reading any state-by-state table, including ours: an empty row can mean “not served”, “not reached” or “nothing signed”, and only the first is documented here. Vending machine locations by state sets out which states fall where.
How does Alaska compare with the other empty states?
Twenty-one states carry no placement, and they are not a uniform group. Sorting them by what is known about why produces three very different categories.
| Category | States |
|---|---|
| Stated as outside the locator’s coverage | Alaska, Hawaii |
| Large states with no placement and no stated reason | Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Minnesota, Oregon, Utah |
| Smaller states with no placement and no stated reason | Delaware, Idaho, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming |
The middle row is the interesting one for anyone reading this record as a market signal. Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Minnesota, Oregon and Utah are all populous states with abundant indoor recreation, and their absence has no published explanation at all. Alaska’s does. A state that has been ruled out tells you about the locator; a state that has simply not been reached may tell you about nothing.
What would an Alaska placement be worth, on national figures?
Only an estimate, and one that should carry its label. Alaska has no local number, so every figure below is the national distribution applied to an Alaskan venue, not a measurement of one.
| Reference figure | National record |
|---|---|
| Median venue share | 40% of net |
| Range | 30% to 50% |
| Pass-through venues (shops, forecourts, malls) | 50% of net |
| Destination venues (bowling, play centres) | 40%, sometimes 30% |
| Minimum term | 16 months, every listing |
| Operator keeps per $8 sale at 40% | $3.72 |
Treating the $1.80 cost of goods in the agreements as the operator’s whole cost per sale, before card fees.
One Alaskan variable sits outside every column: freight. Machines, spares and stock all cost more to land in Alaska than in any state in the record, and nothing in the dataset captures it. An operator transplanting these figures north without adjusting for that is using numbers that were never about Alaska.
Which venue types would Alaska have, if it had any?
The four that carry the national record, all present in Anchorage and most in Fairbanks and Juneau. Between them those categories hold 51 of the 87 signed placements — a clear majority of everything in the dataset.
| Venue type | National placements | Median visitors a day | Visitor-hours a day |
|---|---|---|---|
| Family entertainment centre | 11 | 178 | 445 |
| Trampoline park | 7 | 274 | 411 |
| Bowling alley | 18 | 137 | 370 |
| Indoor playground | 15 | 110 | 164 |
Reading the table: the final column is visitors a day scaled by how long a visit lasts, so it counts hours of opportunity rather than people. Our ranking of vending locations explains the derivation. Alaska has a plausible argument for sitting above those medians in winter, when indoor recreation absorbs far more of the week than it does in a temperate state — but that is a hypothesis about Alaska, not a reading from this data, and nothing here tests it.
What would it take to put Alaska on the record?
A single signed venue reporting its traffic and share. That is the whole threshold, and it is why one placement changes a state’s position in this dataset so much more than a second or third does: Alabama’s lone venue makes it measurable in a way that Alaska is not.
Until then the honest treatment is the one applied here — report the zero, name the one documented reason behind it, and resist filling the space with national averages dressed as local ones. How to find vending machine locations covers the method an operator would use in a state with no locator working it.
Frequently asked questions
How many vending machine placements does Alaska have on the record?
None. Alaska is one of 21 states with no signed placement in the marketplace listings collected on October 5, 2026, and one of only two — with Hawaii — that the specialty locator has publicly excluded from its coverage.
Does no record mean no vending machines in Alaska?
No. The record covers signed placements arranged through one specialty locator over a single season. Alaska plainly has vending machines; what it has none of is a documented placement in this dataset, which is a much narrower claim.
Which states have no vending placement on the record?
Twenty-one: Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia and Wyoming.
Can you estimate what an Alaska venue would be paid?
Only from national figures, and they should be labelled as such. The median across the 81 signed placements that set a share is 40% of net, with pass-through venues at 50% and destination venues at 40% or 30%. Nothing in the data is specific to Alaska.
Why does Alaska have no placements?
The data cannot say. The specialty locator states it does not cover Alaska, which explains the absence of its placements but not whether the market would support any. Distance, freight and a small number of qualifying venues are plausible factors, and none of them are measured here.
Sources
- Nationwide Vending Locators: service, fees and coverage pages, checked October 6, 2026
- Sports and Exercise, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017 spotlight, 2009–15 data)
- Frank Talk, RePlay Magazine (February 2018), on trampoline park visit length
- PinPoint Vending: stated state coverage and open marketplace listings, collected October 5 and 6, 2026